Turning point · Current state: Accelerating

How fast does AI keep improving?

This turning point tracks whether frontier AI is running into meaningful bottlenecks or entering a period where capability growth — including AI-assisted AI research — accelerates.

Why this matters

Almost every future changes if capability growth slows. Faster progress widens the path to rapid deployment, deeper delegation, turbulence, abundance, and control pressure; a sustained slowdown gives institutions more time.

What the states mean

Lower endSlowing / bottlenecked

Repeated evidence of plateauing capability across refreshed measures, with AI-assisted R&D failing to materially speed frontier progress.

MiddleFast, but bounded

Capabilities continue improving quickly, but bottlenecks and diminishing returns keep the pace broadly bounded.

Higher endAccelerating

Repeated gains across robust measures plus evidence that AI-assisted research is itself accelerating the frontier.

What we look for

Frontier autonomous task horizonsTracked as evidence about this turning point.
Performance on refreshed, non-saturated benchmarksTracked as evidence about this turning point.
Evidence that AI is doing a larger share of frontier-lab researchTracked as evidence about this turning point.
Measured effect of AI assistance on research velocityTracked as evidence about this turning point.
Signs of hard bottlenecks in data, compute, algorithms, energy, or experimentationTracked as evidence about this turning point.

Indicators underneath this question

  • Frontier autonomous task horizon
  • Frontier benchmark progress
  • Current capability state
  • AI share of frontier-lab R&D
  • End-to-end autonomous research outputs
  • Measured effect on frontier research velocity

Futures this can move

  • Slow Burn / AI Winter
  • Turbulent Transition
  • Concentrated Power
  • Broad Abundance
  • Loss of Control

What would move the tracker?

The state changes when admitted evidence moves the underlying indicators across the frozen scoring rules. The model should not move because a story is prominent in the news; it moves when the measured condition changes.

See evidence events over time →