Review the mapping
Check each call on its own. Open a move to see it with its mapping details.
| Move | Home problem | Also fits | Lever | Kind | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| "Assume good faith" and "be bold." | C2 | S2 | Follow-through | Ongoing habit | Could sit under Sense and decide as a speaking-up norm. It lands here because its main effect is people acting without waiting for permission. |
| "From suck to not-suck" / the ugly baby | S2 | L2 | Speaking up | Ongoing habit | Could sit under Learn and improve. It lands here because it gets early drafts in front of others while they can still change. |
| Challenge Twice, Then Act | S2 | C5 | Speaking up | Ongoing habit | Could sit under Coordinate and act, since the last step is acting. It lands here because the problem it solves is a concern that never gets heard. |
| Common Ground First | S4 | C1 | Independent thinking | One session | Could sit under Coordinate and act as meeting prep. It lands here because its point is a shared baseline before the group reasons together. |
| Decide It on the Ground | C5 | S5 | Follow-through | One session | Could sit under Sense and decide. It lands here because it moves hard calls out of the moment of action. |
| Dot voting | S2 | C1 | Speaking up | One session | Could sit under Coordinate and act as a way to close a choice. It lands here because its job is surfacing views the loudest voice would bury. |
| Game days / chaos engineering | L5 | C5 | Checking | One session | Could sit under Coordinate and act. It lands here because it tests whether safeguards still work, which is a learning loop. |
| How Did You Know? | L4 | C3 | Memory | One session | Could sit under Coordinate and act, since it is used before handing a step to a model. It lands here because it captures expert know-how before it is lost. |
| Judge the Bet, Not the Result | L1 | S3 | Memory | Ongoing habit | Could sit under Sense and decide. It lands here because it changes how past calls are judged. |
| Listen before you add | X1 | S2 | None | One session | Could sit under Sense and decide as a listening habit. It lands in the change tools because its use case is a tense discussion. |
| Mise en place | C4 | — | Follow-through | Ongoing habit | Weak fit anywhere. It is about preparing before a busy stretch, closest to keeping work flowing. |
| Name summit fever | C5 | S3, S7 | Follow-through | One session | Could sit under Sense and decide, since it names a judgment bias. It lands here because the failure is pushing on when you should stop. |
| Notes Day | L2 | S2 | Speaking up | One session | Could sit under Sense and decide as a speaking-up move. It lands here because it turns built-up frustration into fixes. |
| Premeditatio malorum | S3 | C5 | Checking | One session | Could sit under Coordinate and act next to Escape Routes First. It lands here because it tests optimism before the commitment is made. |
| Provenance by Default | S3 | C3 | Checking | Changes a rule or role | Could sit under Coordinate and act as part of the handoff. It lands here because its purpose is letting the owner judge AI output. |
| Redundancy as safety | L4 | C3 | Memory | Ongoing habit | Could sit under Coordinate and act. It lands here because the problem is context living in one person. |
| Ringi — circulate the written proposal | C1 | — | Follow-through | Changes a rule or role | Could move to the change tools, since it builds ownership of a proposal. It stays because it is a way of closing a decision. |
| say yes and deliver, or say no clearly | C3 | S2 | Handoffs | Ongoing habit | Could sit under Sense and decide as a speaking-up role. It lands here because its core is clear yes-or-no commitments. |
| Sense of the meeting | S5 | C1 | Independent thinking | Changes a rule or role | Could sit under Coordinate and act as a way of closing. It lands here because its strength is weighing a grounded objection before the choice. |
| Sponsorship | L3 | — | Memory | Changes a rule or role | Weak fit. It is closer to support than skill. It could also go to the team-health group. |
| The 10 Standard Fire Orders + 18 Watch Out Situations | S3 | C5, S7 | Checking | Changes a rule or role | Could sit under Coordinate and act as a stop rule. It lands here because its core is recognizing danger signals. |
| The Andon Cord | C5 | S2 | Speaking up | Changes a rule or role | Could sit under Sense and decide as a speaking-up move. It lands here because it stops the line in the flow of work. |
| The Bar Raiser | C4 | S3, S6 | Checking | Changes a rule or role | Could sit under Sense and decide as a checking move. It lands here because it protects the quality bar inside delivery. |
| The Failure Budget | L1 | C2 | Memory | Changes a rule or role | Could sit under Coordinate and act. It lands here because it gives the team room to experiment and learn. |
| The Key Assumptions Check | S1 | S3 | Independent thinking | One session | Could sit under confident claims going unchecked. It lands here because it opens up assumptions the group already shares. |
| The sterile cockpit | C4 | — | Follow-through | Ongoing habit | Weak fit. It protects focus during critical work, closest to keeping work flowing. |
| The Turnaround Time | C5 | L1 | Follow-through | Changes a rule or role | Could sit under Learn and improve. It lands here because it is a stop rule set before the push. |
| The wrong order, followed | C2 | S2 | Speaking up | One session | Could sit under Sense and decide as a speaking-up move. It lands here because the failure is carrying out an order known to be wrong. |
| Verification before dissemination | C4 | S3 | Checking | Ongoing habit | Could sit under Sense and decide as a checking move. It lands here because it is a hold before work goes out. |
| Walk the Roots | C1 | — | Follow-through | One session | Could move to the change tools, since it softens resistance before a meeting. It stays because it gets a decision closed. |
| Weight by Track Record | S5 | S3 | Checking | Changes a rule or role | Could sit under confident claims going unchecked. It lands here because it changes whose view counts on a big call. |
| Yes, and | S1 | S2 | Independent thinking | Ongoing habit | Could sit under the people who know not speaking up. It lands here because it keeps ideas alive long enough to widen the options. |
- S1
- The group lands on the first answer, often the AI's
- S2
- The people who know something don't say it
- S3
- Confident claims go unchecked
- S4
- People aren't working from the same picture
- S5
- Big calls are made by too few people, or for too short a time
- S6
- The team keeps seeing the problem the same way
- S7
- Warning signs get explained away
- C1
- Decisions don't close, or nobody knows who decides
- C2
- Everything escalates to the top
- C3
- Handoffs drop, between people and between people and AI
- C4
- Output outruns the people who review it
- C5
- Risky or hard-to-undo steps go ahead without a stop
- L1
- Failures get buried or blamed
- L2
- The team doesn't stop to reflect between rounds
- L3
- Skills erode as AI takes over the practice work
- L4
- Know-how lives in one person's head
- L5
- Reliance on AI drifts and nobody notices
- X1
- Helping people accept a change (move to the change tools)
- X2
- Team health and pace (park or cut)